6 thoughts on “Sentence syntax trees should be made from morphemes. Semantically ordered trees.”

1. qdinar Post authorApril 15, 2015 at 10:36 pm

   https://twitter.com/qdinar/status/588425459211366403
   #linguistics http://qdb.wp.kukmara-rayon.ru/files/2015/04/Sentence-syntax-trees-should-be-made-from-morphemes.-Semantically-ordered-trees.-2015-04-15.pdf sha1: 7839a0260d009f1e65b7c2c3c9183f22c8369e86 .

   Reply ↓
2. qdinar Post authorApril 16, 2015 at 12:34 am

   i have now submited this new version to cogprints.org
   01:04 : edited metadata and submitted (deposited) again
   may 9 23:34 : edited the metadata back to previous value and submitted (deposited) again

   Reply ↓
3. qdinar Post authorApril 16, 2015 at 12:38 am

   i think it would be good to write in the paper links to previous versions and current version, but i do not make it now to not make too many versions.

   Reply ↓
4. qdinar Post authorSeptember 20, 2015 at 11:24 pm

   maybe this new version would be accepted by arxiv , if i submit it.

   Reply ↓
   1. qdinar Post authorSeptember 20, 2015 at 11:27 pm

      also i had many arguments against arxiv moderators’ reasons with previous arxiv submission, but some how i stopped and have forgotten to struggle with them a little more.

      Reply ↓
5. qdinar Post authorMay 25, 2018 at 10:41 am

   this idea was already published in the past: http://qdb.wp.kukmara-rayon.ru/2017/07/20/words-are-scientifically-baseless-things/#comment-8486

   Reply ↓